NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : FRANCES CLARE DYBALL (BY HER TUTOR CHARLES DYBALL) v THE HARDEN SHIRE COUNCIL; WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION v THE HARDEN SHIRE COUNCIL [2004] NSWSC 486 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 May 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J DECISION : Limited access granted
CATCHWORDS : Evidence - application by defendant for access to documents in possession of plaintiff's investigator - claim for client advice and litigation privilege - asserted imputed waiver LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 s 118, s 119, s 122, s 126 Supreme Court Rules Pt 36 r 13A(1), Pt 36 r 13C, Pt 39 r 2, Schedule K CASES CITED : Roache & Ors v Page & Ors (No 17) [2003] NSWSC 973 Telstra Corporation v BT Australasia Pty Limited (1998) 85 FCR 152 FRANCES CLARE DYBALL (BY HER TUTOR CHARLES DYBALL) (Plaintiff)
v
THE HARDEN SHIRE COUNCIL (Defendant) PARTIES :
WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION (Plaintiff)
v
THE HARDEN SHIRE COUNCIL (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20241 OF 2002; 20098 OF 2004 B Toomey QC / C Heazlewood (Plaintiffs) COUNSEL : L Morris QC / J Morris (Defendants) Walsh & Blair (Plaintiff - Dyball)
SOLICITORS : Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Plaintiff - Westpac)
Deacons (Defendant)
[2004] NSWSC 486 DLJ:1 Ex tempore: revised IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate