NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Benwine v Jabetin; Jabetin v Liqour Adminsitration [2004] NSWSC 995 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/10/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 November 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J DECISION : Judicial review of Board's approval dismissed. Declaration made that remaining poker machine entitlements at end of lease will be held in trust for lessee.
CATCHWORDS : LIQUOR LAW - Licensing - Liquor Administration Board - Poker Machine Entitlements - Board's Approval of Transfer - Whether Board erred in finding that hotel owner had no financial interest in the hotelier's licence - Whether financial interests exhaustibely defined - Whether entitlements a species of property separate from the hotelier's licence - Whether hotel owner will hold any remaining poker machine entitlements on expiry or earlier determination of lease of hotel on a resulting or constructive trust for the current lessee Gaming Machines Act 2001 LEGISLATION CITED : Gaming Machines Amendment Act 2002 Conveyancing Act 1919 Supreme Court Act 1970 Mellor v Liquor Administration Board [2003] NSWSC 38 Wonall Pty Ltd v Clarence Property Corporation Ltd (2003) 58 NSWLR 23 Craig v South Australia (1994-1995) 184 CLR 163 Hart v Bell, unreported, NSWCA, 6 November 1992 Mark v Green (1984) 1 NSWLR 148 at 151 Cross v McHugh (1974) 1 NSWLR 500 O'Sullivan v Farrer (1989) 168 CLR 210 O'Sullivan v Watson (1986) 7 NSWLR 693 YZ Finance Co Pty Ltd v Cummings (1963-1964) 109 CLR 395 CASES CITED : Dilworth v Commissioner of Stamps [1899] AC 99 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Murry (1998) 193 CLR 605 Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242 Muschinski v Dodds (1984-1985) 160 CLR 583 Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538 The Queen v Toohey Ex Parte Meneling Station Pty Ltd (1982) 158 CLR 327 National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175 Halwood Corporation Ltd v Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties (1994) 33 NSWLR 395 Naval, Military and Airforce Club of South Australia Inc v Commissioner of Taxation (1994) 51 FCR 154 Ex parte Berry, Re Kessell (1936) SR (NSW) 485 Baungartner v Baungartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Benwine Pty Ltd - Plaintiff in Proceedings 1592/04 and 2nd Defendant in Proceedings 5487/04 Jabetin Pty Ltd - 1st Defendant in Proceedings 1592/04 and Plaintiff in Proceedings 5487/04 PARTIES : Liquor Administration Board NSW - 2nd Defendant in Proceedings 1592/04 and 1st Defendant in Proceedings 5487/04 Allan Jackson - 3rd Defendant in Proceedings 5487/04 Fanted Pty Ltd - 4th Defendant in Proceedings 5487/04 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1592/04; 5487/04 COUNSEL : Mr T F Bathurst QC/ A Hatzis - Plaintiff in Proceedings 1592/04 and 2nd Defendant in Proceedings 5487/04 Mr D P F Officer QC/ Mr J B Costigan / Mr N Murray - Defendant in Proceedings 1592/04 and Plaintiff in Proceedings 5487/04 Deutsch Partners Lawyers Pty Ltd SOLICITORS : Turnbull Hill Lawyers Crown Solicitors Office - Submitting appearance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate