NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: REGINA v Darko JANCESKI [2005] NSWCCA 287
HEARING DATE(S): 20 June 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 18 August 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Hunt AJA at 1; Howie J at 1
DECISION: Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown Appeal against sentence - Where conviction set aside
Regina (Appellant) PARTIES: Darko Janceski (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/2659
H K Dhanji (Appellant) COUNSEL: D V Arnott (Respondent)
Murphy's Lawyers Inc (Appellant) SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 02/41/0243
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Tupman DCJ
- 1 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/2659 CCAP
SPIGELMAN CJ HUNT AJA HOWIE J
Thursday 18 August 2005 REGINA v Darko JANCESKI Judgment 1 THE COURT: The Respondent to the Crown appeal has today been successful in a conviction appeal. The Court has set aside the conviction of the Respondent and ordered a new trial. The Crown appeal must be dismissed.
**********
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate