Lesvos v Penrith Whitewater Stadium [2005] NSWSC 693

New South Wales Supreme Court

CITATION : Lesvos v Penrith Whitewater Stadium [2005] NSWSC 693

HEARING DATE(S) : 29/4/05

JUDGMENT DATE : 22 July 2005

JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1

DECISION : 1. Strike out paragraphs 4 and 5 of the amended statement of claim; 2. Strike out paragraph 8(a) of the amended statement of claim. The respondents have twenty-one days in which to re-plead; 3. Strike out the word "objectively" in paragraph 13(c), strike out subparagraphs 13(e) and 13(h). Paragraphs 13(a), (b), (c), (d), (f), (g) are to stand as separate paragraphs of the substantive pleading; 4. The respondents are to supply further particulars of their contractual claim within fourteen days of the request for the same; 5. Dismiss the balance of the claims for relief in the applicant's motion

Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)

Accounting Systems 2000 (Developments) Pty Ltd v CCH Australia Ltd (1993) 114 ALR 355 Aussie Home Security Pty Ltd v Sales System Australia Pty Ltd [1999] SCA 145 Concrete Constructions Group v Litevale Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 670 General Steele Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Lesvos Pty Limited v Penrith Whitewater Stadium Limited [2004] NSWSC 441 Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353 CASES CITED : Phoenix Court Pty Ltd v Melbourne Central Pty Ltd (1997) ATPR 46-179 Scammell v Ouston [1941] AC 251 Ting v Blanche (1993) 118 ALR 543 Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Ltd, Federal Court of Australia, (unreported) 18 May 1998 Upper Hunter County District Council v Australian Chilling and Freezing Co Ltd (1967-1968) 118 CLR 429 Western Australia v Bond Corp Holdings Ltd (1991) 13 ATPR Wright v TNT Management Pty Ltd (1989) 15 NSWLR 679