NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 158 A Crim R 93
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: MS2 and Ors v Regina [2005] NSWCCA 397
HEARING DATE(S): 16/11/2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 24 November 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Simpson J at 1; Adams J at 12; Hoeben J at 24
DECISION: Appeals allowed. Applicants resentenced - sentences reduced.
CATCHWORDS: SENTENCE APPEAL - effect of immaturity and youth when serious offence involved - weight to be given to planning of offence - parity.
Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912
C (a minor) v DPP ([1996] AC 1 Postiglione v Regina (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v ALH (2003) 6 VR 276 R v Ao [2003] MSWCCA 43 R v JLC-H [2004] NSWCCA 70 R v Hearne [2001] NSWCCA 37 CASES CITED: R v Ma [2004] NSWCCA 92 R v Pham & Ly (1991) 55 ACrimR R v AEM Senior & Ors [2002] NSWCCA 58 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R (a child) v Whitty (1993) 66 A Crim R 463
MS2 - Applicant PM - Applicant PARTIES: JS - Applicant Crown - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/1368; 2005/1199; 2005/1625
Mr H Dhanji - Applicant MS2 Mr S Corish - Applicant PM COUNSEL: Mr M Johnston - Applicant JS Ms J Girdham - Crown
K Kyriacou Croke & Co - Applicant MS2 S O'Connor, Solicitor for Legal Aid - Applicant PM SOLICITORS: Brenda Duchen - Applicant JS S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate