NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v KS [2005] NSWCCA 87
HEARING DATE(S): 15 March 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 15 March 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Tobias JA at 47, 49; Wood CJ at CL at 1; Buddin J at 48
DECISION: Crown appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - armed robbery - appeal by Director of Public Prosecutions - failure of Respondent to give evidence in accordance with undertaking given at time of sentencing
LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912
R v Bagnell and Russell NSWCCA 10 June 1994 R v El-Sayed (2003) 57 NSWLR 659 R v Hammond (2002) 121 A Crim R 1 R v Hocking [2000] NSWCCA 339 R v J (1992) 64 A Crim R 441 CASES CITED: R v O'Brien NSWCCA 10 June 1993 R v SY and Anor [2003] NSWCCA 291 R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Walters and Watkins (1994) 33 NSWLR 612 R v Waqa [2004] NSWCCA 405
Regina PARTIES: KS
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/59
J Bennett SC (Crown) COUNSEL: H Dhanji
S Kavanagh SOLICITORS: S E O'Connor
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 02/21/3379
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Sides J
- 12 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/59
TOBIAS JA WOOD CJ at CL BUDDIN J
Tuesday 15 March 2005 Regina v KS Judgment 1 WOOD CJ at CL: This is an appeal by the Director of Public Prosecutions pursuant to s 5DA of the Criminal Appeal Act, as a result of the Respondent's failure to give evidence in accordance with an undertaking, which he had given at the time when he was sentenced.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate