NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Forbes v P T White Builder P/L [2004] NSWSC 979 revised - 17/12/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 21 September 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 October 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison DECISION : (1) The appeal is upheld; (2) The decision of Magistrate Coombes made on 1 December 2003, including the decision in relation to the cross calim, is set aside; (3) The matter is remitted to the Local Court to be determined according to law; (4) The defendant is to pay the plaintiffs' costs as agreed or assessed; (5) The defendant is to have a certificate under the Suitor's Fund Act if eligible.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal decision of LCM - adequacy of reasons LEGISLATION CITED : Local Courts (Civil Claims) Act 1970 (NSW) - s 69(2) Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) - Part 51B Allen v Kerr & Anor (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-354 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Divune Pty Limited v Gould Ralph Services Pty Limited [2004] NSWSC 8 CASES CITED : Housing Commission (NSW) v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd (1983) 3 NSWLR 378 Jung v Son, NSWSC, 18 December 1998, Stein JA Pettit v Dunkley (1971) 1 NSWLR 376 R L & D Investments Pty Ltd v Bisby [2002] NSWSC 1082 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Gary Forbes & Luella Forbes (Plaintiffs) PARTIES : P T White Builder Pty Limited (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10130/2004 Mr R N Gye (Plaintiffs) COUNSEL : Mr D Pullinger (Defendant) Ms E Ramsay, A R Connolly & Company SOLICITORS : (Plaintiffs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate