NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 65 NSWLR 187 (2005) Aust Torts Reports 81-825
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: McPherson's Ltd v Eaton & Ors [2005] NSWCA 435
HEARING DATE(S): 24/08/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Hodgson JA at 26; Ipp JA at 31
DECISION: (1) Appeal upheld with costs to be paid by the First Respondent (2) Judgment of O'Meally P be set aside (3) Matter to be remitted to the Dust Diseases Tribunal for retrial (4) The costs of the trial before O'Meally P should be costs in the cause (5) Mrs Eaton should have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW) if otherwise qualified.
CATCHWORDS: NEGLIGENCE - liability of retail vendor - injury sustained by employee of purchaer - retail of goods containing asbestos dust and fibres - additional factor required to establish a duty of care between vendor and purchaser - Laundess v Laundess applied - discussion of additional factor - goods not dangerous in themselves - discussion of determination that a defendant "ought to know" of a danger - reasonable foreseeability - scope of duty - standard of care - how standard of care to be determined - necessity to carry out evaluation required by Wyong Shire Council v Shirt - need to identify with sufficient precision what reasonable person in position of tortfeasor would do by way of response to the reasonably foreseeable risk. D
LEGISLATION CITED: Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW), s 32(1)
Andrews v Hopkinson [1957] 1 QB 229 Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2000) 23 WAR 35 Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479 Bendix Mintex Pty Ltd and Ors v Barnes (1997) 42 NSWLR 307 Brand v Bardon (unreported, NSWCA, 18 July 1997) Burfitt v Kille [1939] 2 KB 743 Burwood Council v Byrnes [2002] NSWCA 343 Christians v Homestake Enterprises Ltd 303 NW 2d 608 Clarke v Army and Navy Co-operative Society Ltd [1903] 1 KB 155 CSR Ltd v Wren (1997) 44 NSWLR 463 Cuckow v Polyester Reinforced Products Pty Ltd (1970) 19 FLR 122 Dovuro Pty Ltd v Wilkins (2003) 215 CLR 317 Elliott v Bail Bungy Co [2002] NSWSC 906 Fisher v Harrods Limited [1966] 1 LI L R 500 Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002) 211 CLR 540 Hardchrome Engineering Pty Ltd v Kambrook Distributing Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 359 Herschtal v Stewart and Ardern Ltd [1940] 1 KB 155 Hoyts Pty Ltd v Burns (2003) 201 ALR 470 Imperial Furniture Pty Ltd v Automatic Fire Sprinklers Pty Ltd [1967] 1 NSWR 29 Jones v Bartlett (2000) 205 CLR 166 Julia Farr Services Inc v Hayes (2003) 25 NSWCCR 138 Lanza v Codemo Management Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 845 CASES CITED: Laundess v Laundess (1994) Aust Torts Rep 81-316 Metropolitan Gas Company v Melbourne Corporation (1924) 35 CLR 186 Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Anzil (2000) 205 CLR 254 Nagle v Rottnest Island Authority (1993) 177 CLR 423 Neindorf v Junkovic [2005] HCA 75 Norton Australia Pty Ltd v Streets Ice Cream Pty Ltd (1968) 120 CLR 635 Northern Sandblasting Pty Ltd v Harris (1997) 188 CLR 313 Romeo v Conservation Commission (NT) (1998) 192 CLR 431 Sakoua v Williams [2005] NSWCA 405 Seltsam Pty Ltd v Ghaleb [2005] NSWCA 208 Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 562 Tame v New South Wales (2002) 211 CLR 317 Temora Shire Council v Stein [2004] NSWCA 236 Teubner v Humble (1963) 108 CLR 491 Thompson v Johnson and Johnson Pty Ltd [1991] 2 VR 449 Vacwell Engineering Company Ltd v BDH Chemicals Ltd [1971] 1 QB 88 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62 Watson v Buckley, Osborne Garrett & Company Ltd and Wyrovoys Products Ltd [1940] 1 All ER 174 Whittlesea City Council v Meric [2005] VSCA 199 Wintle v Nye [1959] 1 WLR 284 Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 Yachuk v Oliver Blais Co Ltd [1949] 2 All ER 150
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate