NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : HANSEN FAMILY INVESTMENTS & ANOR v. LATZ [2005] NSWSC 454
HEARING DATE(S) : Wednesday 11 May 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 11 May 2005
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Hall J at 1
DECISION : I dismiss the application for a stay order. I order the applicants pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the stay application.
CATCHWORDS : Stay of order - summons seeking orders pursuant to Jursidiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act - order dismissing proceedings - application for special leave to appeal to the High Court - extraordinary circumstances - plaintiff facing imminent death - detriment to plaintiff if stay is granted - detriment to defendant if stay is refused.
LEGISLATION CITED : Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW)
BHP Billiton Limited v. Utting & Anor [2005] NSWSC 260 The Annot Lyle (1886) 11 PD 114 CASES CITED : Poline v. Gray (1879) 12 Ch D438 BHP Billiton v. Schultz (2005) 211 ALR 523
PARTIES : HANSEN FAMILY INVESTMENTS & ANOR v. ROBERT LATZ
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC No. 11786 of 2005
Plaintiff: J. Jobson COUNSEL : Defendant: A. Naylor
Plaintiff: McCulloch & Buggy SOLICITORS : Defendant: Alex Stuart & Associates
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Dust Diseases Tribunal
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 109/05
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : O'Meally, J.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
HALL J.
WEDNESDAY 11 MAY 2005
No. 11786 of 2005
HANSEN FAMILY INVESTMENTS PTY. LIMITED & ANOR v. ROBERT LATZ
JUDGMENT (On stay application)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate