NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 63 NSWLR 523
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Ferella v Otvosi [2005] NSWSC 678
HEARING DATE(S) : 1 July 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 5 July 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
DECISION : Amendment allowed of points of defence to amended points of cross claim.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE [113] - Supreme Court procedure - Practice under Supreme Court Rules - Judgments and orders - Order dismissing proceedings - Effect - Whether proceedings can be brought again.
Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 91 Conveyancing Act 1919 ss 78, 89(2) LEGISLATION CITED : Federal Court Rules Order 35 r 6 Supreme Court Act 1970 s 91 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Part 6 r 6(2), Part 8 r 8, Part 34 r 6A and Part 40 r 8
Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 79 ALJR 755 Ferella v Otvosi [2003] NSWSC 1254 Ferella v Otvosi [2004] NSWSC 230 CASES CITED : Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100; 67 ER 313 Makhoul v Barnes (1995) 60 FCR 572 Newmont Pty Ltd v Laverton Nickel NL (No 2) [1981] 1 NSWLR 221 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 598 Spencer Bower, Turner and Handley, The Doctrine of Res Judicata (3rd ed, 1996) [38]
Angelo Ferella (P1 & XD1) Gustavo Ferella (P2 & XD2) PARTIES : Ervin Lloyd Otvosi (D1 & XC1) Keiko Otvosi (D2 & XC2)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2583/03
T F Robertson SC and J E Lazarus (Ps & XDs) COUNSEL : P Brereton SC (Ds & XCs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate