NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 156 A Crim R 225
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Stephen Barry Williams [2005] NSWCCA 355
HEARING DATE(S): 16 September 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1, 50, 52; Simpson J at 2; Buddin J at 51
DECISION: (1) grant leave to the applicant to appeal against the severity of the sentence imposed on the applicant by the District Court on 16 September 2004, and; (2) re-sentence the applicant: (i) on each of the manufacture and supply prohibited drug charges, a non-parole period of three years and three months commencing 23 July 2003 and expiring 22 October 2006 with a balance of term of two years and nine months, the balance of term to expire on 22 July 2009; (ii) on the possess precursor charge, a fixed term of imprisonment for two years also to commence on 23 July 2003 and expire on 22 July 2005; (iii) on the possess prohibited weapon charge, a fixed term of imprisonment for eighteen months commencing 23 July 2003 and expiring on 22 January 2005; (iv) the earliest date eligible for release on parole is 22 October 2006.
CATCHWORDS: appeal against sentence - manufacture prohibited drug - possession of precursor intended for the manufacture of a prohibited drug - supply prohibited drug - possess prohibited weapon - psychiatric disability - global sentence imposed for all offences - no attempt to identify appropriate sentence for each offence - breach of Pearce doctrine - additional offences taken into account - discount for plea of guilty - sentence manifestly excessive - applicant resentenced
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, Part 3 Division 3, s44 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s6(3) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998, Schedule 1, s7(1)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate