NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 146 LGERA 313 66 NSWLR 379
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Cranbrook School v Woollahra Council [2006] NSWCA 155
HEARING DATE(S): 30 March 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 19 June 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; McColl JA at 7; Basten JA at 73
DECISION: (1) Appeal allowed; (2) Set aside the Judgment and Orders (other than Order 2) of the Land and Environment Court dated 14 December 2005; (3) Declare that the development proposed in Development Application No. 508/2005/1 lodged by the appellant with the respondent on 16 August 2005 seeking development consent for the erection of school buildings and associated facilities on the land contained in Folio Identifiers 6/17607, 2/317149, 1/1033645 and 2/1033645 to be used for the purpose of the School conducted by the appellant is development permissible with consent under the provisions of the Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 1995 being development that constitutes a "community facility" within the meaning of that Plan; (4) Respondent to pay the costs of the appeal.(D)
CATCHWORDS: ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING - local environment plan - whether proposed development a "community facility" within meaning of Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 1995 - STATUTORY INTERPRETATION - function of definition clauses - WORDS AND PHRASES - community facility".
Crimes Act 1900 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Interpretation Act 1987 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Registered Clubs Act 1976 Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 1995
Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v GSF Australia Pty Limited [2005] HCA 26; (2005) 79 ALJR 1079 Batchelor & Co Pty Ltd v Websdale [1963] SR (NSW) 49 Betella v O'Leary [2001] WASCA 266 Calleja v Botany Bay City Council [2005] NSWCA 337 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Ltd [1996] HCA 36; (1996) 186 CLR 389 Commissioner for Railways (NSW) v Agalianos [1955] HCA 27; (1955) 92 CLR 390 Cranbrook School v Woollahra Municipal Council [2005] NSWLEC 716. Deeble v Robinson [1954] 1 QB 77 81 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) v Mutton (1988) 12 NSWLR 104 Dilworth v Commissioner of Stamps [1899] AC 99 Favelle Mort Ltd v Murray [1976] HCA 13; (1976) 133 CLR 580 CASES CITED: Gibb v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1966] HCA 74; (1966) 118 CLR 628 Hall v Jones (1942) 42 SR (NSW) 203 Healesville Holdings Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (1997) 97 LGERA 95 Hepples v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1990) 22 FCR 1 Kelly v The Queen [2004] HCA 12; (2004) 218 CLR 216 MacFarlane v Burke, ex parte Burke [1983] 2 Qd R 584 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 R v McN (1963) 63 SR (NSW) 186 Transport Accident Commission v Treloar [1992] 1 VR 447 Victims Compensation Fund v Brown [2002] NSWCA 155; (2002) 54 NSWLR 668 Warringah Shire Council v Punnett & Associates Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 480; (2001) 122 LGERA 1 YZ Finance Co Pty Limited v Cummings [1964] HCA 12; (1963-1964) 109 CLR 395 Zickar v MGH Plastic Industries Pty Ltd [1996] HCA 31; (1996) 187 CLR 310
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate