NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
REGINA v Warren Alan FORBES [2005] NSWCCA 377 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 21 October 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 4 November 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; McClellan CJ at CL at 149; Hall J at 150
DECISION: 1 Appeal against conviction dismissed; 2 Leave to appeal from each sentence granted; 3 The sentences imposed by his Honour are quashed and the following sentences imposed; 4 In the case of Ross Kimball; (i) Imprisonment for nine years commencing on 29 May 2002 to expire on 28 May 2011; (ii) Non-parole period of six years and nine months commencing on 29 May 2002 to expire on 28 February 2009; 5 In the case of Andrew Hullick; (i) Imprisonment for 12 years commencing on 1 March 2007 to expire on 28 February 2019; (ii) Non-parole period of eight years commencing on 1 March 2007 to expire on 28 February 2015.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against conviction - Juror misconduct - Where juror found in possession of written material possibly related to trial - Whether trial miscarried - Whether directions sufficient to cure irregularity - CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against conviction - Pre-trial and trial publicity - Whether trial miscarried - Whether directions to jury sufficient to overcome prejudice - CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against directions - Adequacy of summing up - - Where trial judge did not follow bench book formulation - Whether directions in relation to self-defence correct in law - Whether combination of written and oral directions confusing - CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against sentence - Manslaughter - Whether trial judge erred in failing to adequately take into account guilty plea and offer to plead guilty - Crimes Act 1900, ss24 - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s21A(3)(k) - CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against sentence - Manslaughter - Joint criminal enterprise - Sentence of 12 years imprisonment - Whether manifestly excessive - Crimes Act 1900, s24 - CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against sentence - Manslaughter - Excessive self-defence - Sentence of 12 years imprisonment - Whether manifestly excessive - Crimes Act 1900, s24, 410, 418, 419, 421.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate