NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 139 LGERA 449
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
Bentley (for National Parks & Wildlife Service v Gordon; Bentley (for National Parks & Wildlife Service v B.G.P. Properties Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCCA 157 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 5 November 2004
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 April 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Buddin J at 23; Smart AJ at 24
DECISION: (1) Grant leave to appeal; (2) Appeals allowed; (3) Set aside orders made by Cowdroy J on 9 July 2004 and in lieu thereof order that the applications to amend the summonses be dismissed; (4) Opponent to pay the claimants' costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal; (5) Remit the proceedings to the Land and Environment Court for continuance in that Court.
CATCHWORDS: Offence if a person by an act or omission does anything that causes damage to the habitat of a threatened species - charges that by slashing and clearing vegetation and/or crushing vegetation and/or constructing access tracks caused damage - prosecution proposed to rely on each in the alternative - whether act causing damage an ingredient of offence - whether charges bad for duplicity - held yes and yes.
Johnson v Miller (1937) 59 CLR 467; McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority [2000] 50 NSWLR 127; Parker v Sutherland (1917) 116 LT 820; CASES CITED: S v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 266; Stanton v Abernathy (1990) 19 NSWLR 656; Walsh v Tattersall (1996) 188 CLR 77.
Jason Robert Bentley (for National Parks & Wildlife Service - Claimant in both matters PARTIES: Hugh Charles Gordon - Opponent in 2004/1849 B.G. P. Properties - Opponent in 2004/1853
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate