NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hip Wo Pacific v Sun-Forbes [2005] NSWSC 1172
HEARING DATE(S) : 15 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 November 2005
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Harrison
DECISION : (1) The plaintiff is to provide security for costs of the defendant in the sum of $45,000 in the form acceptable to the Registrar within 28 days otherwise the proceedings are to be stayed until such sum is paid; (2) Costs are reserved.
CATCHWORDS : Strike out statement of claim - security for costs - particulars
LEGISLATION CITED : Rules 13.4(1), 14.28(1) & 42.21 UCPR
Idaport Pty Limited v National Australia Bank Limited [2000] NSWSC 744 CASES CITED : Yorke v Lucas (1985) CLR 661
Hip Wo Pacific Herbal Company Pty Limited (ACN 094 667 302) (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Lijia Sun-Forbes (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20181/2005
Mr Anthony Britt (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr Mark Lawson (Defendant)
Truman Hoyle Lawyers (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Heazlewoods Bushby International (Defendant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE HARRISON
MONDAY, 21 NOVEMBER 2005
20181/2005 - HIP WO PACIFIC HERBAL COMPANY PTY LIMITED (ACN 094 667 302) v LIJIA SUN-FORBES
JUDGMENT (Strike out statement of claim - security for costs - particulars) 1 HER HONOUR: By notice of motion filed 10 October 2005 the defendant seeks firstly, an order that the statement of claim be struck out on the grounds that there is no reasonable cause of action due to questions of law pursuant to Rule 13.4(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) (UCPR) or Rule 14.28(1) of the UCPR; secondly, in the alternative, an order that the plaintiff provide security as to costs in the event that the plaintiff's claim is unsuccessful; and thirdly an order that the plaintiff to properly answer the request for further and better particulars furnished on the plaintiff on 30 June 2005. 2 The plaintiff is Hip Wo Pacific Herbal Company Pty Limited (ACN 094 667 302). It did not rely upon any affidavit evidence. The defendant is Lijia Sun-Forbes. The defendant relied on three affidavits of Leigh Marian Turner sworn 10 October 2005, 2 November 2005 and 8 November 2005.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate