NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Fenshaw Pty Ltd v Nguyen [2005] NSWSC 250
HEARING DATE(S) : 28/2/05, 1-2/3/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 March 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Burchett AJ
DECISION : Relief to be granted to the plaintiffs to correct erroneous title position subject to order, pursuant to the cross-claim, under s.87 of the Trade Practices Act 1974.
CATCHWORDS : Contract to redevelop shopping centre by changing strata titles to separate Torrens titles, utilising common property to enlarge supermarket - contract partly oral and partly implied - part performance - misleading conduct under s.52 Trade Practices Act - relief under s.87 - breadth of Court's powers
Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Trade Practices Act 1974
Carr v McDonald's Australia Ltd (1994) 63 FCR 358 at 367 Kizbeau Pty Limited v W G & B Pty Limited (1995) 184 CLR 281 at 298 Gates v The City Mutual Life Assurance Society Limited (1986) 160 CLR 1 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Widin (1990) 26 FCR 21 at 33-37 CASES CITED : Steadman v Steadman [1976] AC 536 Regent v Millett (1976) 133 CLR 679, 683 Maddison v Alderson (1883) 8 App Cas 467 at 479 Watson v Delaney (1991) 22 NSWLR 358 at 366
Fenshaw Pty Limited (First Plaintiff) Zhong Ting Tian & Jing Liu (Second Plaintiffs) Thanh Chay Loi and Huyen Phung Kha (Third Plaintiffs) Dung Ly and Thi Thu Nguyen (Fourth Plaintiffs) PARTIES : Saba Guler (Fifth Plaintiff) Ngoc Tuan Nguyen (First Defendant) Giang Thanh Nguyen (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate