NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2005) Aust Torts Reports 81-807
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Port Stephens Shire Council v Booth & Ors; Port Stephens Shire Council v Gibson & Anor [2005] NSWCA 323
HEARING DATE(S): 16 June 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Giles JA at 2; Hunt AJA at 199
DECISION: (1) In 40517/04, grant leave to appeal and direct the filing of the notices of appeal within seven days; (2) In 40517/04 and 40821/04, appeals dismissed; (3) The claimant/appellant to pay the costs of the opponents/respondents.
CATCHWORDS: Negligence - council's approval of development and building applications - council's issue of s 149 certificates - land within zone of noise affectation in ANEF - purchasers of land from developer - discussion of duty of care owed by council to purchasers in relation to grant of approvals - whether council in breach of duty of care - whether in breach of duty of care in relation to issue of s 149 certificates - whether defence of good faith under s 149(6) made out - losses claimed included that paid more for land than true value - whether causation of loss established - whether later draft or proposed ANEF with less affectation meant no loss suffered - whether interest properly included in damages. D
Albert Shire Council v Bamford (1997) 97 LGERA 33; Alec Finlayson Pty Ltd v Armidale City Council (1994) 51 FCR 387; Armidale City Council v Alec Finlayson Pty Ltd (1999) 104 LGERA 9; Astonland Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers [2001] QSC 380; Bankstown City Council v Alamdo Holdings Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 46; Bryan v Maloney (1995) 182 CLR 609; Caledonian Colleries Ltd v Speirs (1957) 97 CLR 202; Central Coast Leagues Club v Gosford City Council (Giles J, 9 June 1998, unreported); City of Botany Bay Council v Jazabas Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 94; Crimmins v Stevedoring Industry Finance Committee (1999) 2000 CLR 1; Curran v Greater Taree City Council (1992) Aust Torts Rep 81-152; Degman Pty Ltd (in liq) v Wright (1983) 2 NSWLR 384; Forbes Shire Council v Pace [2002] NSWSC 966; Hill v Van Erp (1997) 188 CLR 159; House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; CASES CITED: HTW Valuers (Central Qld) Pty Ltd v Astonland Pty Ltd (2004) 217 CLR 640; Jazabas v Botany Council [2000] NSWSC 58; Kizbeau Pty Ltd v W G & B Pty Ltd (1995) 184 CLR 281; Lamont v Wyong Shire Council (Palmer AJ, 13 December 1991, unreported); Melaleuca Estate Pty Ltd v Port Stephens Shire Council [2004] NSWSC 415; Mid Density Developments Pty Ltd v Rockdale Municipal Council (1993) 44 FCR 290; Murphy v Overton Investments Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 388; Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180; Pyrenees Shire Council v Day (1998) 192 CLR 330; Smith v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2005] NSWCA 29; Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424; Voli v Inglewood Shire Council (1963) 110 CLR 74; Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514; Wollongong City Council v Fregnan (1982) 1 NSWLR 244; Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 515.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate