NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : ACD Tridon v Tridon Australia [2004] NSWSC 480 HEARING DATE(S) : 10, 22 & 30 March, 17 & 25 May, 2 June 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 June 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Austin J DECISION : Orders to be made, subject to conditions, to permit variation of undertakings to allow the legal representatives of the plaintiff to take a statement from Mr Arkin on limited topics, and to inspect accountant's reports and related documents
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - undertakings to Court - undertaking given subject to further order of Court - circumstances in which Court can and should make orders permitting partial release or variation of undertakings - discretionary considerations ACD Tridon Inc v Tridon Australia Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 77 ACD Tridon Inc v Tridon Australia Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 896 Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170 CASES CITED : Arkin v Tridon Australia Pty Ltd (2002) 43 ACSR 610 Arkin v Tridon Australia Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1372 Butt v Butt [1987] 1 WLR 1351 Fylas Pty Ltd v Vynal Pty Ltd [1992] 2 Qd R 593 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Bank of Australia (No 5) [2000] NSWSC 148 ACD Tridon Inc (P/A) Tridon Australia Pty Ltd (D1/R) PARTIES : Richard Wellesley Lennox (D2/R) Sandra Lennox (D3/R) Tridon New Zealand Ltd (D4/R) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5738/01 COUNSEL : S G Finch SC (P/A) M S Jacobs QC with P J Bambagiotti (D/R) SOLICITORS : Allens Arthur Robinson (P/A) Cutler Hughes & Harris (D/R)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate