NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Tesrol Joinery Pty Limited v CEFLA Scri [2005] NSWSC 528
HEARING DATE(S) : 23/05/05, 24/05/05, 25/05/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 25 May 2005
Equity Division JURISDICTION : Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
DECISION : Indemnity costs ordered.
CATCHWORDS : Practice and procedure - Indemnity Costs - Need for Commercial List litigation to be tied to Overriding Purpose Rule - Identified issues - Defendant claiming to 'put the plaintiff to proof'
LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW)
ADC v White (1999) NSWSC 43 Alghussein Establishment v Eton College [1988] 1 WLR 587 Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1993) 111 ALR 289 Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Limited (1991) 174 CLR 64 Damberg v Damberg (2001) 52 NSWLR 492 CASES CITED : Gramophone Co. Limited v Magazine Holder Co. Limited (1911) 28 RPC 221 Houghton & Anor v Immer (No 155) Pty Limited & Anor (1997) 44 NSWLR 46 McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 152 ALR 83 Pollock v Mackenzie (1866) 1 QSCR 156
Tesrol Joinery Pty Limited (ACN 003 111 224) (Plaintiff) PARTIES : CEFLA Scri (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50159/03
Mr G Inatey SC, Mr V Gray (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr R Scruby (Defendant)
Malcolm Johns & Company (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Bryan Gorman & Company (Defendant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate