NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 156 A Crim R 467
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
REGINA v THOMPSON [2005] NSWCCA 340 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 21 March 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Barr J at 48; Johnson J at 49
DECISION: Appeal upheld. Sentence reduced
CATCHWORDS: SENTENCING - deemed supply of not less than a large commercial quantity of a prohibited drug - s25(2) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1986 - plea of guilty - Form 1 offences - supply of a single tablet of ecstasy - having possession of an amount reasonably suspected of being unlawfully obtained - standard non-parole period - s21A, s54B(2) Crimes Sentencing Procedure Act 1999 - aggravating factors - mitigating factors - sentencing principles in Way - middle of the range of objective seriousness - special circumstances - accumulated assets. (ND)
Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1986 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990
Markarian v R (2005) 215 ALR 213 R v AJP (2004) 150 A Crim R 575 R v GJ Davies [2004] NSWCCA 319 R v Johnson [2004] NSWCCA 140 R v Markarian [2003] NSWCCA 8 CASES CITED: R v Mendez [2005] NSWCCA 246 R v Pham [2005] NSWCCA 94 R v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Thompson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168
REGINA PARTIES: Lionel THOMPSON
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate