NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Jazairy v Malouf t/as Gerard Malouf & Partners [2005] NSWSC 808
HEARING DATE(S) : 8 August 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 August 2005
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Harrison
DECISION : (1) In costs assessment file No 92004/2001 leave to extend time to file an appeal is granted; (2) The appeals are upheld; (3) The application for redetermination is remitted to the Costs Review Panel for the purpose of its providing of reasons for its determination of 21 April 2004 that the costs agreement is not unjust; (4) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal decision of costs review panel - s 208D: "unjust"
Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) - s 208 LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Regulation 2002 - Reg 68
Advanced Gaming Technologies Pty Limited v Julieann P Ahern & 88 Ors [1999] NSWSC 45 Chapmans Ltd v Yandell (t/as Yandells) [1999] NSWCA 361 CASES CITED : Coulter v Regina (1988) Larsen v Vile [1999] NSWCA 397 Malouf v Jazairy [2003] NSWSC 762
Haifa Jazairy (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Gerard Francis Malouf t/as Gerard Malouf & Partners (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12455/2004
Mr R Horsley (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr M J Heath (Defendant)
Malouf & Partners SOLICITORS : (Defendant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Costs Review Panel
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 92004/2001
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Member John Sharpe & Member Ian Dwyer
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate