NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Shane Michael Franklin [2005] NSWCCA 24
HEARING DATE(S): 4 February 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 4 February 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Dunford J at 1,41; Bell J at 40
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - sentencing - maliciously inflict grievous bodily harm - discount for utilitarian value of plea of guilty
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
R v Lynn [2004] NSWCCA 222 R v Mako [2004] NSWCCA 90 CASES CITED: R v Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 225 R v Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
PARTIES: Regina v Shane Michael Franklin
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/2536
P Byrnes SC - Applicant COUNSEL: B Knox SC - Respondent
Byrnes Lawyers - Applicant SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh - Respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 02/31/0320
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Garling DCJ
- 4 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2536/04
DUNFORD J BELL J
FRIDAY 4 FEBRUARY 2005 REGINA v SHANE MICHAEL FRANKLIN Judgment 1 DUNFORD J: This is an application by Shane Michael Franklin for leave to appeal against the sentence imposed on him by his Honour Judge Garling in the District Court at Port Macquarie on 19 March 2004 following the applicant's plea of guilty to one count of maliciously inflict grievous bodily harm on the victim, Neil Glover, at Laurieton on Anzac Day 25 April 2002. The maximum penalty for the offence prescribed by s 35(1)B of the Crimes Act 1900 is seven years imprisonment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate