NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Urban Traders P/L v Proceris P/L [2005] NSWSC 1192
HEARING DATE(S) : 29, 30 September 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 25 November 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
DECISION : See para 92.
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY – specific performance – circumstances in which specific performance will be ordered before any breach of contract.
Conveyancing Act, 1919 s 66G LEGISLATION CITED : Property Stock and Business Agents Act, 2002
Butt v M'Donald (1896) 7 QLJ 68 Earl of Rippon v Hobart (1834) 3 MynK 169, 176, 40 ER 65 Hasham v Zenab [1960] AC 316 Hooper v Rogers [1975] Ch 43 Mackay v Dick (1881) 6 AppCas 251 CASES CITED : Marks v Lilley [1959] 1 WLR 749 R v MacFarlane; ex parte O'Flanagan (1923) 32 CLR 518 Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Limited v St Martin's Investments Pty Ltd (1979) 144 CLR 596 Tito v Wadell (No. 2) [1977] Ch 106 Turner v Bladin (1951) 82 CLR 463 Urban Traders Pty Ltd v Proceris Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 360
Urban Traders Pty Limited ACN 065 803 661 (Plaintiff) Proceris Pty Limited ACN 091 569 176 (D1) PARTIES : Glenn Roberts (D2) Ragnam Pty Limited ACN 002 000 697 (D3)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5080/05
BA Coles QC & GA Sirtes (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : TA Alexis SC & Ms P Sibtain (Defendants)
Cara Marasco & Co (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Hazan Hollander Solicitors (D1, D2, D3)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate