NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 52 ACSR 374
New South Wales Supreme Court
ASIC v Rich [2005] NSWSC 62 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : Various dates between 6 September and 7 December 2004, then written submissions, and oral submissions on 4 and 7 February 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 16 February 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
DECISION : Documents admissible and not excluded from evidence
CATCHWORDS : SEARCH WARRANTS - Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Pt 1AA - whether access to seized things by consultant of investigating agency is prohibited by s 3F(5) - whether electronic things copied under s 3L(2)(c) are things "seized" for purposes of s 3F(5) - whether things seized under search warrant may be used in an investigation with civil and criminal elements, and in a subsequent civil proceeding - whether owner of seized things may consent to their use and retention for purposes of civil proceedings
ASIC Law ss 119A, 121, 127 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 471A, 477 LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Law ss 180, 181, 182, 184, 999, 1308 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss 3, 3C, 3E, 3F, 3K, 3L, 3ZV
ASIC v Marshall Bell Hawkins Ltd [2003] FCA 833 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 923 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 934 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 951 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 963 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 969 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 970 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 1062 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 1089 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 1090 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 1104 Austin v The Commonwealth (2003) 215 CLR 185 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199 Brooks v Burns Philp Trustee Co Ltd (1969) 121 CLR 432 Brown v United States 411 US 223 (1973) Carroll v Mijovich (1991) 25 NSWLR 441 Coco v R (1993) 179 CLR 47 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v De Vonk (1995) 61 FCR 564 Donnelly v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd (1998) 45 NSWLR 570 Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575 Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 State Tr 1029, 95 ER 807 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 Ghani v Jones [1970] QB 693 Gollan v Nugent (1988) 166 CLR 18 Greer v New South Wales Police [2002] NSWSC 356 Grollo v Macauley (1995) 45 FCR 336 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 Hart v Commissioner, Australian Federal Police (2002) 124 FCR 384 CASES CITED : Hunter BNZ Finance Ltd v CG Maloney Pty Ltd (1998) 18 NSWLR 420 Hunter v Southam Inc [1984] 2 SCR 145 Hyman v Hyman [1929] AC 601) Jacobsen v Rogers (1995) 182 CLR 572 Johns v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 178 CLR 408 Johnson v United States 333 US 10 (1948) Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kennedy v Baker (2004) 207 ALR 247 Lieberman v Morris (1944) 69 CLR 69 Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1980] 1 QB 49 Malubel Pty Ltd v Elder (1998) 88 FCR 242 Marcel v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1992] Ch 225 Maynegrain Pty Ltd v Compafina Bank [1984] 1 NSWLR 258 Minnesota v Carter 525 US 83 (1998) Morison v London County and Westminster Bank Ltd [1914] 3 KB 356 Morris v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [1993] Ch 372 Ousley v The Queen (1997) 192 CLR 69 Polycarpou v Australian Wire Industries Pty Ltd (1995) 36 NSWLR 49 Puglisi v Australian Fisheries Management Authority (1997) 148 ALR 393 R v Ladocki [2004] NSWCCA 336 R v Nicholas (2000) 1 VR 356 Re Morris (1943) 43 SR (NSW) 352 Rakas v Illinois 439 US 128 (1978) Re H and the Adoption Act [2004] NSWSC 1242 S & M Motor Repairs v Caltex Oil (1988) 12 NSWLR 358 United States v Salvucci 448 US 83 (1980) Wade v New South Wales Rutile Mining Company Pty Ltd (1969) 121 CLR 177 Williams v Keelty (2001) 111 FCR 175
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate