NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
Regina v Street [2005] NSWCCA 139 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 12/04/2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 14 April 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Wood CJ at CL at 1; Grove J at 2; Hoeben J at 3
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted and appeal allowed. Sentences imposed in District Court quashed - applicant re-sentenced.
CATCHWORDS: Correct application of s21A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, effect of finding of special circumstances on structure of sentences where more than one sentence is involved.
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v LWP [2003] NSWCCA 215 R v Pham (1991) 55 A Crim R 128 R v Tarek Mohamadin [2004] NSWCCA 401 CASES CITED: R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Walker [2005] NSWCCA 109 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 R v Youkhana [2004] NSWCCA 412
Matthew Thomas Street - Applicant PARTIES: Crown - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/94
M Johnston - Applicant COUNSEL: P Barrett - Crown
SE O'Connor - Solicitor for Legal Aid SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 03/21/0239
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Delaney DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/94
WOOD CJ at CL GROVE J HOEBEN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate