NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Transport Appeal Board & anor [2004] NSWSC 962 HEARING DATE(S) : 22/07/2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Hislop J DECISION : 1. Summons dismissed; 2. Plaintiff to pay the second defendant's costs; 3. Plaintiff to pay the costs, if any, of the first defendant.
CATCHWORDS : Inferior tribunal reversing dismissal of employee - Perogative relief refused - No error of law. LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 - ss 65, 69 Transport Appeal Boards Act 1980 - s 23 Blyth Chemicals Limited v Bushnell (1933) 49 CLR 66 CASES CITED : Ford v Transport Appeal Board (NSW) (1987) 18 IR 163 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584 Plaintiff - State Rail Authority of New South Wales PARTIES : First Defendant - Transport Appeal Board Second Defendant - Anthony Kambouris FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30019/04 Plaintiff - Ms C Ronalds COUNSEL : First Defendant - Submitting appearance Second Defendant - Mr A Kambouris (in person) Plaintiff - Sparke Helmore SOLICITORS : First Defendant - Crown Solicitor's Office Second Defendant - Mr A Kambouris (in person)
LOWER COURT Transport Appeal Board JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 1 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
Hislop J
25 October 2004
30019/04 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Transport Appeal Board and anor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate