NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Hometeam Constructions Pty Ltd v McCauley [2005] NSWCA 303
HEARING DATE(S): 27 September 2004; 28 September 2004
JUDGMENT DATE: 7 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Ipp JA at 1; Tobias JA at 2; McColl JA at 3
DECISION: Statement of Claim; (1) Appeal allowed.; (2) Set aside the verdict for the respondent on the claim and all orders (including costs orders) made on the claim by Murrell DCJ on 18 June 2003.; (3) Verdict for the appellant on the claim.; (4) Remit the matter to Murrell DCJ to quantify the loss or damage suffered by the appellant and determine all questions of costs of the claim.; ; Amended Cross-Claim; (5) Set aside the verdict, judgment and orders made against the appellant on the cross-claim by Murrell DCJ on 18 June 2003.; (6) Verdict for the appellant on the cross-claim.; (7) Order the respondent to pay the appellant's costs of and incidental to the cross-claim.; Costs of Appeal; (8) Respondent to pay the appellant's costs of and incidental to the appeal.
CATCHWORDS: BUILDING & ENGINEERING CONTRACTS - Notice of Default - whether Notice technically valid - construction - whether warranty to perform building works with due diligence and within the time stipulated in the contract imposed conjoint obligation - due diligence - breach of contract - onus of proof - works not completed by date set for practical completion - evidence of failure to perform building work with due diligence - explanation of period works took. (D)
Conveyancing Act 1881 (Imp) Fair Trading Act 1987 LEGISLATION CITED: Home Building Act 1989 Trade Practice Act 1974
Australian Development Corporation Pty Ltd v White Constructions (ACT) Pty Ltd (1996) 12 BCL 317 Brady v Group Lotus Car Cos plc [1987] 3 All ER 1050 Brenmar Building Co Pty Ltd v University of Newcastle (1999) 15 BCL 467 Etlis v New Age Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 165 Fletcher v Nokes [1897] 1 Ch 271 Pauling v Mayor, Alderman & Burgesses of Borough of Dover (1855) 10 Exch 753; (1855) 156 ER 644 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; (2003) 214 CLR 118 Greater London Council v Cleveland Bridge & Engineering Co Ltd (1986) 34 BLR 50 Hart v MacDonald [1910] HCA 13; (1910) 10 CLR 417 Hick v Raymond & Reid [1893] AC 22 CASES CITED: Hobbs v Petersham Transport Co Pty Ltd [1971] HCA 26; (1971) 124 CLR 220 Hooker Constructions Pty Ltd v Chris's Engineering Contracting Co [1970] ALR 821 Hounslow London Borough Council v Twickenham Garden Developments Ltd [1971] Ch 233 Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 749 Maynard v Goode [1926] HCA 4; (1926) 37 CLR 529 Minister for Public Works v Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of New South Wales, unreported, 15 February 1989, BC8902548) Re Stewardson Stubbs & Collett Pty Ltd & Bankstown Municipal Council [1965] NSWR 1671 State of New South Wales v Austeel Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 392 Watson v George [1953] HCA 41(1953) 89 CLR 409 Westminster Corporation v J Jarvis & Sons Ltd and Another [1970] 1 WLR 637 Hudson's Building and Engineering Contracts (11th Ed)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate