NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Mohammed Skaf [2005] NSWCCA 298
HEARING DATE(S): 26 July 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Studdert J; Bell J; Latham J
DECISION: Leave to appeal against the sentences imposed is granted, and the appeal is allowed. The sentences imposed in respect of counts 1 and 2 are confirmed. The sentence imposed in respect of count 14 is quashed. In lieu thereof, the applicant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of five years to commence on 1 January 2005 and to expire on 31 December 2009. The sentence imposed in respect of count 15 is quashed. In lieu thereof, the applicant is sentenced to imprisonment for a term of fifteen years, also to commence on 1 January 2005 and to expire on 31 December 2019, with a non parole period to commence on 1 January 2005 and to expire on 2 January 2012. The first date upon which the applicant will be eligible for release upon parole is 2 January 2012.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - application for leave to appeal against sentences - detention of complainant for advantage - aggravated sexual intercourse without consent (in company) - whether errors in findings and approach by sentencing judge - whether sentences manifestly excessive.
Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act, s 6 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act, s 61J, 90A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, ss 33, 44, 59
Ibbs v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 447 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Bailey (1998) 35 A Crim R 458 R v Jones (1993) 70 A Crim R 449 CASES CITED: R v AEM & Ors [2002] NSWCCA 58 R v B. Skaf & M. Skaf (2004) 60 NSWLR 86 R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 857 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267 Veen v The Queen (No. 2) (1987-1988) 164 CLR 465
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate