NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
Amaca Pty Ltd v Ridgway [2005] NSWCA 417 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 07/11/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Santow JA at 2; Brownie AJA at 3
DECISION: Appeal upheld. Judgment and orders of the Dust Diseases Tribunal set aside. Matter be remitted to the Tribunal for re-hearing. Respondent to pay Appellant's costs of the appeal, but should have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951.
CATCHWORDS: Limitation of Actions - whether a failure to comply with s48(4) of the Limitation of Actions Act 1936 of South Australia operates to extinguish a cause of action. - Appeal - error of law - irreconciliable findings of fact, not explained.
Limitation of Actions Act 1936 of South Australia LEGISLATION CITED: Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 Suitors' Fund Act 1951
Beale v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1997) 48 NSWLR 206 Sinha v Health Care Complaints Commission [2001] NSWCA 206 Mahon v Air New Zealand Ltd [1984] 1 AC 808 Amaca Pty Ltd v New South Wales [2003] HCA 44, 119 ALR 596 Robinson v Craven (1994) Aust Torts Reps 81-315 CASES CITED: Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd [1993] 15, 67 ALJR 517 Chapman v Luminis Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1084 Reid v Agco Australia Ltd [2000] VSC 363 Woolworths (SA) Pty Ltd v Cauchi [2001] SASC 48 Van Den Heuval v Tucker [2002] SASC 361 Suter v Development Assessment Commission [2003] SAERDC 47
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate