NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : MK and JA Roche Pty Limited & Ors v Metro Edgley Pty Limited & Anor [2004] NSWSC 780 HEARING DATE(S) : 24/08/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 August 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J DECISION : See paragraphs 17, 18
CATCHWORDS : Application to recall reasons for Judgment - Principles Autodesk v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 Bromley v Bromley (No 2) [1965] P 111 De L v Director-General, New South Wales Department of Community Services (No 2) (1997) 190 CLR 207 Fexuto Pty Ltd v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) (1998) 29 ACSR 290 Fletcher Construction Australia Ltd v Lines Macfarlane & Marshall Pty Ltd (2001) 4 VR 28 Harrison's Share Under a Settlement, Re; Harrison v Harrison [1955] Ch 260 Mulvena v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (Mahoney, Clarke and Sheller JJA, Court of Appeal of New South Wales, 16 June 1992, unreported) BC9201810 Nakhla v McCarthy [1978] 1 NZLR 291 CASES CITED : Nova Scotia v Province of Nova Scotia (1977) 23 NSR 357 Sherpa v Anderson (Young J, Supreme Court of New South Wales, 14 October 1993, unreported) Smith v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (Priestley, Sheller and Powell JJA, NSW Court of Appeal, 21 November 1996, unreported) Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (No 2) (1992) 176 CLR 256 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd (No 2) (1982) 150 CLR 29 Twenty-First Australia Inc. v Shade & Anor (1998) NSWSC 325 Wentworth v Rogers [2002] NSWSC 921 Wentworth v Wentworth [1999] NSWSC 638 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (No 2) (1982) 149 CLR 672 MK & JA Roche Pty Limited (ABN 25 076 529 952) (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : Michael Kevin Roche, Christopher John Roche, William Timothy Roche, Kevin Michael Roche, Gabrielle Mary Roche (Second Plaintiff) Metro Edgley Pty Limited (ABN 37 082 440 042) (First Defendant) Multiplex Limited (formerly Multiplex Constructions Pty Limited (ACN 008 687 063) (Second Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50069/04 COUNSEL : Mr DJ Hammerschlag SC, Mr VF Kerr (Plaintiffs) Mr CR Newlinds SC, Ms RS Francois (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Lane & Lane (Plaintiffs) Clayton Utz (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate