NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2007) DFC 95-400
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Vollmer v Hauber Davidson [2006] NSWCA 79
HEARING DATE(S): 07/03/2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 12 April 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Ipp JA at 2; Hislop J at 3
DECISION: 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Each party to pay his or her costs of the proceedings before Master Macready and in this Court.
CATCHWORDS: Adjustment of property interests - Costs.
Civil Procedure Act 2005 - s 98(1) Conveyancing Act 1919 - s 66G LEGISLATION CITED: Property (Relationships) Act 1984 - s 20 Supreme Court Act 1970 - s 76 Supreme Court Rules - Pt 52A r 11 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 - Pt 42 r 1)
CASES CITED: House v King (1936) 55 CLR 499
PARTIES: Applicant - Gisella Vollmer Respondent - Guenter Hauber Davidson
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40860/04
COUNSEL: Applicant - Mr D.J. Lloyd Respondent - Mr R. Harper
SOLICITORS: Applicant - Stuart Fowler & Partners Respondent - Watts McCray
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2637/02
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Macready M
- 1 -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40860/04
MASON P IPP JA HISLOP J
12 April 2006 Gisella VOLLMER v Guenter HAUBER DAVIDSON JUDGMENT
1 MASON P: I agree with Hislop J. 2 IPP JA: I agree with Hislop J.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate