NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Sunia James Kafovalu v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 141
HEARING DATE(S): 26 April 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 24 May 2007
JUDGMENT OF: James J at 1; Rothman J at 2; Harrison J at 3
DECISION: Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal against sentence dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against severity of sentence, robbery in company, affray, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, assaulting police officer in execution of duty thereby occasioning actual bodily harm, resiting police officers in execution of duty, objective seriousness of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, whether error to take into account fact that offender on parole at time of offence, no error shown, no miscarriage of sentencing discretion, sentences not manifestly excessive
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 - ss 58, 59(1), 60(2), 93C(1), 97(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s6(3)
Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Keen [2004] NSWCCA 86 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242 R v Moffitt (1990) 20 NSWLR 114 R v Price [2004] NSWCCA 186 R v Readman (1990) 47 A Crim R 181 CASES CITED: R v Richards [1981] 2 NSWLR 464 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Tran [1999] NSWCCA 109 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 219 Re Attorney-General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) (No 2 of 2002) (2002) 137 A Crim R 196 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate