NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 165 A Crim R 532
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v SCIBERRAS [2006] NSWCCA 268
HEARING DATE(S): 31 July 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 September 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Hulme J at 2; Hislop J at 80
DECISION: See paragraph 79
PARTIES: Regina Carmel Sciberras
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/795
COUNSEL: Crown: C Williams Respondent: Mr Haesler SC
SOLICITORS: Crown: S Kavanagh Respondent: S O'Connor
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/21/3193
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Sides DCJ
- 1 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/795
BEAZLEY JA HULME J HISLOP J
Tuesday, 5 September 2006 Regina v Carmel SCIBERRAS Judgment 1 BEAZLEY JA: I agree with Hulme J. 2 HULME J: On 16 February 2006 the Respondent to this Crown appeal pleaded guilty to 4 charges, viz:- (i) That between 24 August and 10 September 2004 he did, on 3 or more separate occasions supply a prohibited drug for reward, namely methylamphetamine and 3-4 methylenedioxymethylamphetamine, (ii) That between 29 July 2004 and 12 January 2005 he supplied a prohibited drug, namely methylamphetamine being in an amount greater than a commercial quantity of methylamphetamine, (iii) That between 29 July 2004 and 12 January 2005 he supplied a prohibited drug, namely cannabis, and (iv) That between 30 July and 12 January 2005 he supplied a prohibited drug, namely 3,4 methylenedioxymethyl-amphetamine being in an amount greater than a commercial quantity of 3,4 methylenedioxymethyl-amphetamine
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate