NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Suttle v R [2007] NSWCCA 264
HEARING DATE(S): 28/08/07
JUDGMENT DATE: 14 September 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Latham J at 4; Rothman J at 5
(a) Leave to appeal be granted; DECISION: (b) The appeal be dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentencing – error not shown – not inappropriate sentence in circumstances.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
Courtney v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 195 R v AN [2005] NSWCCA 239 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 CASES CITED: R v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 R v Lesi [2005] NSWCCA 63 R v Letteri (NSWCCA), unreported, 18 March 1992 R v Murchie (1999) 108 A Crim R 482 R v Poihipi [2001] NSWCCA 306 R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 The Queen v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102
PARTIES: Maria Katrina Suttle (Applicant) Regina (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/3297
COUNSEL: S. Corish (Applicant) N. Adams (Crown)
SOLICITORS: B. Dowe (LAC) D. Kelly (ODPP)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/21/2048
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Knight DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 31/08/06
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2007/3297
BASTEN JA LATHAM J ROTHMAN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate