NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2006) NSW ConvR 56-146
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: LUONG DINH LUU v SOVEREIGN DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD & 2 ORS [2006] NSWCA 40
HEARING DATE(S): 20 February 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Handley JA at 1; McColl JA at 2; Bryson JA at 3
DECISION: 1. Appeal allowed with costs.; 2 .Set aside orders 1, 2 and 3 of the orders of Judge Truss of 10 December 2004.; 3. In lieu thereof give judgment for the defendants with costs.
CATCHWORDS: VENDOR AND PURCHASER – Deposit – nature of deposit – identification of deposit on construction of inconsistent references in Contract – forfeiture of deposit on failure to complete – exemption of forfeiture of reasonable deposit from law avoiding contractual penalties – whether liquidated damages – contract on proper construction provided for deposit less than 1% of p.p. – Special Condition 5 provided that if purchaser committed a default 10% deposit should become due and payable – reference in SC 5 to that payment as a deposit was a misdescription – the provision of SC 5 relating to further payment on default was void as a penalty. - PENALTY – what constitutes penalty – deposit on sale of land – a provision requiring payment of up to 10% of purchase price to be made on any default by purchaser where contract established that the deposit was about 1%, was a penalty and was void notwithstanding that, if the contractual deposit had been 10% that would have been a reasonable deposit and not a penalty – consideration whether the provision was liquidated damages – held that it was not.
LEGISLATION CITED: Conveyancing Act 1919 ss.55 & 55(2A).
Acron Pacific Ltd v Offshore Oil NL (1985) 157 CLR 514 AMEV-UDC Finance Ltd v Austin (1986) 162 CLR 170 Ashdown v Kirk [1999] 2 Qd R 1 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 99 Brien v Dwyer (1978) 141 CLR 378 Brien v Dwyer [1976] 2 NSWLR 420 CASES CITED: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79 Freedom v A H R Constructions Pty Ltd [1987] 1 Qd R 59 Howe v Smith (1884) 27 Ch D 89 Mehmet v Benson (1963) 81 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 188 Mehmet v Benson (1965) 113 CLR 295 PC Developments Pty Ltd v Revell (1991) 22 NSWLR 615 Ringrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 71, 80 ALJR 219 Romanos v Pentagold Investments Pty Ltd (2003) 217 CLR 367
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate