NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Bick v Regina (Commonwealth) [2006] NSWCCA 408
HEARING DATE(S): 13 December 2006 JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Howie J at 3; Price J at 4
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 12/13/2006
DECISION: Leave to appeal is granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Criminal Appeal - Commonwealth Offences - Social Security Fraud - Whether sentencing Judge erred in determining non - parole period - Whether ratio of non - parole period to aggregate head sentence excessive - Departure from usual range.
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 29 D LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)s 19 A B (1) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) s135.1 (5) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6 (3)
Bernier v The Queen (1998) 102 A Crim R 44 at 49 R v Behar (Court of Criminal Appeal, 14 October 1998, unreported) R v Carr (2002) 135 A Crim R 171 R v Drazkiewicz (Court of Criminal Appeal,23 November 1993, unreported) R v Ida Ronen, Nitzan Ronen, Izhar Ronen [2006] NSWCCA 123 CASES CITED: R v John Viana [2001] NSWCCA 171 R v Mears (1991) 53 A Crim R 141 R v Meloh [2001] NSWCCA 211 R v Price [2004] NSWCCA 186 R v Purdon (Court of Criminal Appeal, 27 March 1997 unreported) R v Sweet (2001) 125 A Crim R 341 Stitt v The Queen (1998) 102 A Crim R 428
PARTIES: Shahab Aghajani Bick v Regina (Commonwealth)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/1315
COUNSEL: W. Abrahams - Crown J Manuell - Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate