NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: STUDMAN v REGINA [2007] NSWCCA 263
HEARING DATE(S): 4 June 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 September 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Grove J at 12; Hidden J at 13
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW: Sentence - Commonwealth and State offences of a fraudulent nature - sentencing judge's approach to setting non-parole periods - no lesser sentence warranted
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Crimes Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1989 (Cth)
R v Button & Anor (2002) 129 A Crim R 242 R v Harmouche (2005) 158 A Crim R 357 Cahyadi v The Queen (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 Cahyadi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 1 Shore (1992) 66 A Crim R 37 Director of Public Prosecutions v El Karhani (1990) 21 NSWLR 370 CASES CITED: Williams v The King [No. 2] (1934) 50 CLR 551 Putland v The Queen (2004) 218 CLR 174 Johnson v The Queen (2004) 78 ALJR 616 R v Viana [2001] NSWCCA 171 Bick v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 408 The Queen v Alimic [2006] VSCA 273 The Queen v Gee (2003) 212 CLR 230 Broadhurst (1988) 25 A Crim R 349 Delcaro (1989) 41 A Crim R 33
PARTIES: Michael Simon STUDMAN (applicant) REGINA (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate