NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Mohamed & Anor v Hurstville Tower Medical Clinic Pty Ltd (in liquidation) & 9 Ors [2006] NSWSC 4
HEARING DATE(S) : 24/10/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 31 January 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Orders approving receiver's remuneration, dispensing with accounts and discharging receiver
CATCHWORDS : RECEIVERS - receivers appointed by court - remuneration - principles governing determination of remuneration - application of principles to the particular case
CASES CITED : Ide v Ide (2004) 184 FLR 44 Wenkart v Pantzer [2005] FCA 1572
Ismail Mohamed - First Plaintiff Medical Centre 2000 - Second Plaintiff Hurstville Tower Medical Clinic Pty Limited (in liquidation) - First Defendant Southern Sydney Medical Centre Pty Limited (in liquidation) - Second Defendant Sonzan Pty Limited (in liquidation) - Third Defendant Bharathi Madadi Reddy - Fourth Defendant PARTIES : Michael Mihajlov - Fifth Defendant Ahmed Mohamed - Sixth Defendant Cedric Teo - Seventh Defendant Barclitus Pty Limited - Eight Defendant Souther Sydney Medical Centre Pty Limited (in liquidation) as Trustee of the Southern Sydney Medical Centre Trust - Ninth Defendant K M Mihajlov Pty Limited - Tenth Defendant Maxwell William Prentice as Receiver of the Southern Sydney Medical Centre Trust - Applicant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3880/01
COUNSEL : Dr I. Mohamed - First Plaintiff in person Mr J.W.J. Stevenson SC - Receiver of First, Second, Third and Ninth Defendants - Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate