NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Gumland v Duffy [2006] NSWSC 10
HEARING DATE(S) : 21, 22 July 2005; 19, 20, 21 September 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 February 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Divison
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Macready at 1
CATCHWORDS : Contract - construction of terms of contract and its variation to determine amount of rent payable. - Penalties. Held that clauses merely provided for payments of past monies due and thus not a penalty. - Discharge. Did various breaches give a right to terminate? Whether such breaches were waived. - Damages. Whether a claim for damages for loss of bargain in respect of a lease arose. - Landlord and Tenant. Construction of use and occupation covenants. - Termination of Tenancy. Whether there was a surrender of sub-lease and creation of new tenancy as a result of sub-tenant deciding to pay half the holding over rent. - Guarantee and indemnity. Discharge of surety. Failure to include a term required by the principal contract to be included in a guaranteed sub-lease discharged surety. Held that it did. - Indemnities. Whether indemnity responded to situation where the need for indemnity arose from a breach of contract by the person entitled to the benefit of the guarantee. Held that it did not. - Construction of term of operation of guarantee.
PARTIES : Gumland Property Holding Pty Limited v Duffy Bros Fruit Markets (Campbelltown) Pty Limited and 2 Ors
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50066/2005
J. West QC and NJ Kidd for plaintiff COUNSEL : D. Cassidy QC and R. Keller for 1st defendant G. Turner for 2nd and 3rd defendants
PricewaterhouseCoopers Legal for plaintiff SOLICITORS : Davis Legal for 1st defendant Curwood & Partners for 2nd and 3rd defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate