NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave application refused with costs by the High Court - 25 May 2007
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Leichhardt Council v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 6
HEARING DATE(S): 20 October 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 February 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ; Beazley JA; Bryson JA; Basten JA; Campbell JA
DECISION: The Court orders the amendment of orders 2 and 3 made by the Court in Leichhardt Council v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWCA 353, in order to apply that decision also to the residue land.
PARTIES: Leichhardt Council (Appellant) Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40166/2005
COUNSEL: T Robertson SC, L Goodchild (Appellant) B Walker SC, A Galasso SC (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Margaret Lyons (Appellant) Clayton Utz (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Land & Environment Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 30318 of 2003
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Lloyd J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 4 March 2005
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: [2005] NSWLEC 86
- 2 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 40166/2005
SPIGELMAN CJ BEAZLEY JA BRYSON JA BASTEN JA CAMPBELL J
Friday 9 February 2007 LEICHHARDT COUNCIL v ROADS AND TRAFFIC AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate