NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Mabbett v Josef & Sons Contracting Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1452
HEARING DATE(S) : 7.11.05, 8.11.05, 15.12.05, 1.2.06, 10.3.06, 2.6.06, 15.6.06, 6.11.06
JUDGMENT DATE : 6 November 2006
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Adams J at 1
DECISION : Leave granted to plaintiff to proceed on his statement of claim against the first defendant.; The limitation period has not expired in respect of the action against the second defendant; Liberty to apply in relation to the question of costs.
Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 s26 Limitation Act 1969 s52 LEGISLATION CITED : Motor Accidents Act 1988 s 52(4) Occupation Health and Safety Act 1983 Workers Compensation Act 1987 s151D
Creevey v Barrois [2005] NSWCA 264 Kotulski v Attard [1981] 1 NSWLR 115 CASES CITED : Salido v Nominal Defendant (1993) 32 NSWLR 524 South Brisbane Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Tekno Ceramics Pty Limited v Milat [2003] NSWCA 254
Sidney Mabbett by his tutor Noeline Apiata (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Josef & Sons Contracting Pty Limited (In Liquidation) 844 537 (First Defendant) New South Wales Land & Housing Corporation (Second Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12296/04
A J Bartley SC, J R K Pryde (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : T M Wardell (First Defendant) D L Ronzani (Second Defendant)
Carroll & O'Dea (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Edwards Michael Moroney Lawyers (First Defendant) McCabe Terrill Lawyers (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate