NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: REGINA v. BCC [2006] NSWCCA 130
HEARING DATE(S): Thursday 23 February 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 April 2006
JUDGMENT OF: James J at 1; Simpson J at 2; Hall J at 3
DECISION: Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - Crown appeal - supply of commercial quantity of ecstasy - whether sentence manifestly inadequate - assistance to law enforcement authorities - prior good character - remorse - good prospects of rehabilitation
Criminal Appeal Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
R v Bimahendali [1999] NSWCCA 409 R v Peel (1971) 1 NSWLR 247 R v Dang [2005] NSWCCA 430 R v Harmouche [2005] NSWCCA 398 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v Rushby (1977) 1 NSWLR 594 R v Myers (CCA, unreported 13 February 1990) R v Collins [2000] NSWCCA 236 R v O'Brien & Mammone (CCA, unreported 23 August 1989) R v Wong & Ng (1988) 39 A Crim R 1 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 CASES CITED: R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 York v The Queen [2005] 79 ALJR 1919 R v Cartright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243 R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 R v Tooth [2001] NSWCCA 407 R v Yenice (1994) 72 A Crim R 234 R v Ward (CCA, unreported 29 May 1995) Braithwaite v R [2005] NSWCCA 451 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 R v JCE (2000) 120 A Crim R 18 R v Foster [2001] NSWCCA 215 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate