NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Sweeney & Vandeleur Pty Limited v Angyal & Ors [2006] NSWSC 246
HEARING DATE(S) : 5 April 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 12 April 2006
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Malpass at 1
DECISION : The proceedings are dismissed; the plaintiffs are to pay the costs of the proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : Role of costs assessor - matters such as validity of the costs order and a breach of a Bar regulation do not fall within his or her task - no matter of law.
LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 2004, ss384, 385 New South Wales Barristers' Rules, r87
CASES CITED : Furber v Gray [2002] NSWSC 1144
Sweeney & Vandeleur Pty Limited (First Plaintiff) Charles Sweeney (Second Plaintiff) Robert Angyal (First Defendant) Robert Kaye (Second Defendant) PARTIES : Paul Fury (Third Defendant) John Scott Wheelhouse (Fourth Defendant) Lewis De Vere Tyndal (Fifth Defendant) Michelle Painter (Sixth Defendant) Sixth Floor, St James Hall Pty Limited (Seventh Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 14868/05
COUNSEL : Mr M Eirth (Plaintiffs) Mr M L Brabazon (Defendants)
SOLICITORS : Noel F Bracks & Co (Plaintiffs) Macquarie Legal Practice (Defendants)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Costs Assessor
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 91177 of 2005
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Mr R G Webley
- 7 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
Associate Justice Malpass
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate