NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Alameddine v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 317
HEARING DATE(S): 25 August 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 October 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; Kirby J at 34; Hislop J at 35
DECISION: APPEAL ALLOWED; RESENTENCED
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - SENTENCE - OFFENDER ALLOWS HIS PREMISES TO BE USED FOR AMPHETAMINE MANUFACTURE - HIMSELF AN ADDICT - WHEN ARREST IMMINENT OFFENDER ACCIDENTALLY CAUSES LABORATORY TO EXPLODE - SERIOUS INJURIES (BURNS) SUFFERED - LONG TERM CONSEQUENCES - EXTRA CURIAL PUNISHMENT - NO PRINCIPLE DENYING THAT MITIGATION AVAILABLE EVEN IF INJURIES SELF INFLICTED AND CONNECTED WITH OFFENCE - OTHER GROUNDS INVOLVING NO POINT OF PRINCIPLE - EXCESSIVE TOTAL TERM BUT NON PAROLE PERIOD IRREDUCIBLE
Power v The Queen 1974 131 CLR 623 R v Allpass 1993 72 A Crim R 561 R v Azar [2004] NSWSC 797 R v Barci 1994 76 A Crim R 103 CASES CITED: R v Daetz & anor 2003 139 A Crim R 398 R v Haddara 1997 95 A Crim R 108 R v Noble 1996 1 Qd R 329 R v Webb [2004] NSWCCA 330 Sharpe v R [2006] NSWCCA 255
PARTIES: Abdel Alameddine v Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/1490
COUNSEL: P. Barrett (Crown) C. Smith (Applicant)
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh (DPP) S. Etherington (Applicant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/21/0118
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Viney ADCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 12 December 2005
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: n/a
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/1490
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate