Haydon John Newman v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] NSWCA 84
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
New South Wales
Court of Appeal
CITATION: Haydon John Newman v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] NSWCA 84
HEARING DATE(S): 7 March 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 18 April 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Bell J at 1; Price J at 1
DECISION: Proceedings dismissed with no order as to costs.
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL – New South Wales - challenge to jurisdiction of the Court of Criminal Appeal – instituted as a precautionary measure
CASES CITED: Newman v R [2007] NSWCCA 103
PARTIES: Haydon John Newman (Appellant)
Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40122/07
COUNSEL: M J Ierace; T Evers (Appellant)
D Woodburne (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: P McGhee, Intellectual Disability Rights Service (Appellant)
S Kavanagh, Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 06/11/0076
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Nicholson DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 18 July 2006
- 1 -
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40122/07
SPIGELMAN CJ
BELL J
PRICE J
Wednesday 18 April 2007
Haydon John NEWMAN v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS & ANOR
Judgment
1 THE COURT: These proceedings were instituted as a precautionary measure by reason of the challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court of Criminal Appeal in the case of Newman v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 103. As determined in those proceedings, the challenge to jurisdiction has been rejected.
2 On this basis these precautionary proceedings have proven to be unnecessary.
3 The order of the Court is that the proceedings should be dismissed with no order as to costs.
**********
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.