NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: PRESTIGE PROPERTY SERVICES PTY LTD v CHOI & ANOR [2007] NSWCA 363
HEARING DATE(S): 26, 27 November 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 November 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Hodgson JA at 76; Handley AJA at 77
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 27 November 2007
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS: EVIDENCE – Admissibility and relevancy – opinion evidence – expert opinion – in general – whether failure to consider expert evidence – whether failure to give reasons rejecting evidence – joint report of experts – evidence given by experts on contractual construction – where opinion outside experts' field of expertise – where problems with the evidence addressed when trial judge admitted the evidence - TORTS – Negligence – liability for others' negligence – independent contractors – delegable duty – council and independent contractor – duty to remove dangerous branches from trees – whether duty was 'wholly' delegated - TORTS – Negligence – essentials of action for negligence – duty of care – miscellaneous cases – scope and existence of duty – duty to remove dangerous branches from trees – duty arose from contract – whether duty confined to dangerous branches that are visible from ground level – dangerous branches meant those that were detectable upon reasonable inspection – duty not limited to inspection from ground
PRESTIGE PROPERTY SERVICES PTY LTD PARTIES: YUN HEE CHOI CITY OF SYDNEY COUNCIL
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40119/2007
D Nock SC/ J Downing (Appellants) COUNSEL: M B Williams SC (1st Respondent) P Menzies QC/ J Steward (2nd Respondent)
Ebsworth & Ebsworth (Appellant) SOLICITORS: Gaitanis Lawyers (1st Respondent) McCulloch & buggy (2nd Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate