NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Tortell, R v Tsegay [2007] NSWCCA 313
HEARING DATE(S): 24 September 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 15 November 2007
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Adams J at 21; Harrison J at 22
DECISION: Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against inadequacy of sentence – offences of aggravated robbery and knowingly being carried in a stolen conveyance – non custodial sentence imposed based on strong subjective circumstances – whether error in assessing objective seriousness of offence – whether non custodial sentence for offence of robbery inappropriate in circumstances of aggravation – respondents sentenced to period of community service – sentences already commenced – common law principle against double jeopardy - exercise of residual discretion of Court not to interfere - appeal dismissed
Crimes Act 1900 - ss 94, 95, 154A(1)(b) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - ss 5D
Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Everett v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Burns [2007] NSWCCA 228 R v Geddes (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 554 CASES CITED: R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Hernando (2002) 136 A Crim R 451 R v Hicks (1987) 45 SASR 270 R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 R v Horne [1999] NSWCCA 391 R v Kyroglou [1999] NSWCCA 106 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate