NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Ilioski v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 164
HEARING DATE(S): 7 February 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 July 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Hunt AJA at [1], [170]; Adams J at [165]; Latham J at [169]
DECISION: 1. The appeal against conviction is dismissed.; 2. The application for leave to appeal against sentence is refused.; 3. The appellant is to surrender himself into custody to serve the remainder of his sentence.
CATCHWORDS: Appellant charged with wounding with intent to murder or alternatively to do grievous bodily harm - found guilty of the statutory alternative of malicious wounding - principal issue at trial was identification - whether verdict unreasonable - whether directions given on issue of identification adequate - trial judge's obligation under s 116 of the Evidence Act 1995, to inform the jury of special need for caution both generally and in the circumstances of the particular case, arises whatever defence is raised and however the case is conducted - that obligation relates to the reliability of the identification evidence, not to its honesty - bias does not fall within s 116, and obligation to give directions relating to bias depends on how the case was conducted - need for identification parade, s 114 of the Evidence Act - negative identification evidence - compromise verdict - whether miscarriage of justice based on accumulation of conduct by appellant's counsel at trial.
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 Jury Act 1977
Ali v The Queen (2005) 214 ALR 1 Alexander v The Queen (1981) 145 CLR 395 Black v The Queen (1993) 179 CLR 44 Dhanhoa v The Queen (2003) 217 CLR 1 Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555 Driscoll v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 517 Gipp v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 106 Hajje v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 23 Kanaan & Ors v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 109 Knight v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 495 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 215 ALR 213 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606 Mraz v The Queen (1955) 93 CLR 493 Mule v The Queen [2002] WASCA 101 Nudd v The Queen (2006) 225 ALR 161 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 624 Regina v Abusafiah (1991) 24 NSWLR 531 CASES CITED: Regina v Araya (2005) 155 A Crim R 55 Regina v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Regina v Carusi (1997) 92 A Crim R 52 Regina v Clarke (1997) 97 A Crim R 414 Regina v Clough (1992) 28 NSWLR 396 Regina v Coe [2002] NSWCCA 385 Regina v Fowler (2003) 151 A Crim R 166 Regina v Fuge (2001) 123 A Crim R 310 Regina v Heuston (1995) 81 A Crim R 387 Regina v Johnson [2005] NSWCCA 186 Regina v Kanaan [2005] NSWCCA 385 Regina v Pederick (BC9201982), CCA, 21 May 1997, unreported Regina v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 Regina v Storey (1978) 140 CLR 364 Regina v Wilson (2005) 62 NSWLR 346 Regina v Wood [2005] NSWCCA 233 The Queen v O'Connor (1980) 146 CLR 64 The Queen v Tran [2000] Qd R 430 TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124 Wilde v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 365
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate