NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: MULATO v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 282
HEARING DATE(S): 16 February 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 11 September 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Simpson J at 45; Adams J at 51
DECISION: 1 Leave to appeal granted and appeal allowed; 2 Sentence quashed; 3 Substitute a non-parole period of five years and a balance of term of three years.
CATCHWORDS: Sentence appeal - plea of guilty - significance of standard non-parole period - significance of time spent on remand
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 54B(2) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 s 25(2)
AT v R [2005] NSWCCA 410 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55CLR 499 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 79 ALJR 1048 R v AJP [2004] NSWCCA 434; 150 A Crim R 575 R v Blair [2005] NSWCCA 78; 152 A Crim R 462 CASES CITED: R v Davies [2004] NSWCCA 319 R v Hung Lo [2005] NSWCCA 436; 159 A Crim R 71 R v Poon (2003) 56 NSWLR 284 R v Sangalang [2005] NSWCCA 171 R v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Vu v R [2006] NSWCCA at 188
Alexander MULATO (Applicant)
PARTIES: v
REGINA
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/1953
COUNSEL: S Odgers SC (Applicant) D Frearson SC (Crown)
SOLICITORS: P Katsoulis (Applicant) S Kavanagh (Crown)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/21/1081
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: English DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate