NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Jones & Ors (No7) [2007] NSWSC 1158
JUDGMENT DATE : 17 April 2007
JUDGMENT OF : Buddin J
DECISION : Objection overruled.
CATCHWORDS : Objection to cross-examination of Crown witness upon his antecedent conduct
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act
Regina Adam Jones PARTIES : Samuel Jones Elizabeth Jean Jones Lydia Jones Adam Samuel Jones
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2006/2009; 2006/2010; 2006/2011; 2006/2012; 2006/2007
J Pickering (Crown) D Price (Adam Jones) (Accused) COUNSEL : D Stewart (Samuel Jones) (Accused) G Whitehead (Elizabeth Jones) (Accused) C Watson (Lydia Jones) (Accused) W Terracini SC/J Trevallion (Adam Samuel Jones) (Accused)
S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Director of Public Prosecutions) Conaghan Hunter P/L (Adam Jones) SOLICITORS : Ross Hill & Co (Samuel Jones) Neil J O'Connor & Associates (Elizabeth Jones) Ian Rolfe Solicitor (Lydia Jones) Adamson Solicitors (Adam Samuel Jones)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION LIST
BUDDIN J
TUESDAY 17 APRIL 2007
2006/2009 - Regina v Adam JONES 2006/2010 - Regina v Samuel JONES 2006/2011 - Regina v Elizabeth Jean JONES 2006/2012 - Regina v Lydia JONES 2006/2007 - Regina v Adam Samuel JONES
JUDGMENT – (No 7) Objection to cross-examination of John William Smith upon aspects of his antecedent conduct
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate